Mathews J Nedumpara
In the 10yr period between 2011 to 2020
a)Review petitions (civil) dismissed- 19710
Allowed- 92
b) Review Petitions (Crl)
Dismissed- 6087
Allowed- 48
c) Curative petitions (civil)
Dismissed- 2155
Allowed- 0
d) Curative petitions (Crl)
Dismissed- 620
Allowed- 3
So far as curative petitions go, I am not concerned.
The curative jurisprudence itself is against the constitution, a judicial legislation, which no court has the power to do. I consider this mechanism to be in ignorance of the elementary jurisprudence. The court failed to comprehend the distinction between res judicata and stare decisis and mistook one for the other, which would be evident anyone who reads Hurra v. Hurra, by which judgment this mechanism of reopening a case even after review has been dismissed came to be invented.
National Lawyers’ Campaign For Judicial Transparency And Reforms
November 2, 2024
More News
-
No recovery against MSMEs without attempt at revival as provided by law.
September 12, 2024 -
PIL is antithetical to the Principles of natural justice
November 2, 2024
About Us
Latest Posts
-
National Lawyers’ Campaign For Judicial Transparency And Reforms
November 2, 2024 -
In the 10yr period between 2011 to 2020
November 2, 2024